|
Colorado State University E. coli
Study |
|
Comparison of Intervention Technologies for Reducing
Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Cuts and Trimmings
J. R. RANSOM, K. E. BELK,* J. N. SOFOS, J. D.
STOPFORTH, J. A. SCANGA, and G. C. SMITH
Center for Red Meat Safety, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado
State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1171
SUMMARY
This study evaluated the
decontamination efficacy of water (W; 25° or 55oC), 2% acetic acid
(AA), 0.001% acidified chlorine (AC), 2% lactic acid (LA; 55oC),
0.02% acidified sodium chlorite (ASC), 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride
(CPC), 1% lactoferricin B (LB), and 0.02% peroxyacetic acid (PAA) on
Escherichia coli O157:H7 when applied to fresh beef carcass
tissue (BCT) surfaces (40 cm2) and lean tissue pieces (LTP; 300 g).
Samples were inoculated with a five-strain composite of E. coli
O157:H7 and then immersed in the treatment solutions for 30 s.
Viable cell counts were enumerated by plating on sorbitol MacConkey
(SMAC) agar. Overall, CPC was most effective (P < 0.05) and
reduced bacterial populations by 4.8 log CFU/cm2 and 2.1 log CFU/g
on BCT and LTP, respectively. Of the treatments commonly used by
industry, LA was the most effective (P < 0.05), as it reduced
pathogen populations by 3.3 log CFU/cm2 and 1.3 log CFU/g on BCT and
LTP, respectively. Additionally, ASC, AA, PAA, LB, AC and W reduced
pathogen populations when plated on SMAC by 1.9, 1.6, 1.4, 0.7, 0.4
and 1.2 log CFU/cm2, when applied to BCT, while corresponding
reductions following the above treatment applications to LTP were
1.8, 1.1, 1.0, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.3 log CFU/g, respectively. Results
from this study indicated that LA and ASC were the most effective
pathogen decontamination solutions currently approved for commercial
use. Information regarding the antibacterial efficacy of
decontamination solutions should prove beneficial to industry
personnel as a means of improving microbiological quality as well as
potentially improving the quality of non-intact beef tissue.
Link to full study in PDF:
Colorado State Study.pdf
 |
. |
|